To Compare Corneal Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetics to Controls at University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.

Cornea And Anterior Segment

Authors

  • R.D. Komolafe Department of Ophthalmology, Braithwaite Memorial Specialist Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • C.N Pedro-Egbe Department of Ophthalmology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • E.A. Awoyesuku Department of Ophthalmology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • I.N. Aprioku Department of Ophthalmology, Braithwaite Memorial Specialist Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • E.U. Ani Department of Ophthalmology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State, Nigeria.
  • D.E George Department of Ophthalmology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State, Nigeria.

Abstract

Introduction: The cornea is the most densely innervated tissue in the body[1]. Its innervations provide protective and trophic functions for corneal repair in relation to disease, trauma, or surgery[1]. The cornea is about 300-600 times more sensitive than the  skin[2] and is supplied by the long ciliary nerves which are derived from the trigeminal nerve[3]. Corneal lesions can be found in  approximately one-half of asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus and were first reported over thirty years ago[4]. Symptomatic diabetic corneal complications are usually heralded by subclinical abnormalities such as decreased corneal sensitivity[5]. Several studies[6,7,8] on Caucasians and Africans have highlighted a significant difference in the sensitivity between  diabetics and diabetic- free control. Aim: To compare the corneal sensitivity of diabetics with controls using the Cochet –Bonnet aesthesiometer.

Methods: This is a hospital-based case control study. The study involved consecutive recruitment of diabetics as they presented to the Endocrinology Clinic of University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH). Controls were recruited simultaneously; there was no  bias in subject selection. Study proforma was used to access demographic information and disease-related variables including past  medical history, alcohol history, drug history, use of topical medications and past ocular surgeries. The Cochet- Bonnet aesthesiometer  was used to measure corneal sensitivity on all study subjects. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for  Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 20.0 and p value of d”0.05 was taken as statistically significant. 

         Views | Downloads: 32 / 13

References

Sandford-Smith J. Evisceration, enucleation and exenteration: In Eye surgery in hot climate (Chapter 10). 1994 Publishers F.A.Thorpe. 193- 200.

Bodunde OT, Ajibode HA, Awodein OG. Destructive eye surgeries in Sagamu. Nigerian Med Practitioner 2005; 48(2): 47- 49.

Olurin O. Causes of Enucleation in Nigeria. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973; 76(6): 987-991.

Monsudi KF, Ayanniyi AA, Balarabe AH. Indications for ocular destructive surgeries in Nigeria. Nepal Journal of Ophthalmology 2013; 5(9): 24-27.

Majekodunmi S. Causes of enucleation of the eye at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital: a study of 101 eyes. West Afr J Med . 1989vol 8 (4):289-291.

Olatunji FO, Ibrahim FU, Ayanniyi AA, Azonobi RI, Takur RB, Maji DA. Indications for Surgical removal of eyes in a Tertiary Institution in North Eastern Nigeria. The Annals of African Surgery. 2011; 7:20-24

Downloads

Published

2023-03-26

How to Cite

Komolafe , R., Pedro-Egbe, C., Awoyesuku , E., Aprioku , I., Ani, E., & George, D. (2023). To Compare Corneal Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetics to Controls at University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.: Cornea And Anterior Segment. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society of Nigeria, 1(1). Retrieved from https://tosn.org.ng/index.php/home/article/view/168